The simplest way to improve performance is to use a materialized view. Not sure > how to implement it in postgres. ERROR: cannot refresh materialized view “public.materialized_view_example” concurrently. Key Differences Between View and Materialized View. No. The goal of this patch is to allow a refresh without interfering with … If I create a materialized view of this FT, including indexes, it takes about 3-4 hours. - I'm not sure if unique key index requirement is reasonable or not, because users only add CONCURRENTLY option and not merging or incremental update. If then in turn the SQL query on the foreign database server hangs, e.g. REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW completely replaces the contents of a materialized view. About Refresh Modes for Materialized Views. Only one thing you should do is: Periodically refresh your Materialized View to get newly inserted data from the base table. I still wonder there should be some way. To execute this command you must be the owner of the materialized view. But they are not virtual tables. Introduction to PostgreSQL Materialized Views. The concurrent mode requires at least PostgreSQL 9.4 and view to have at least one unique index that covers all rows. ACCESS EXCLUSIVE is the most restrictive lock mode (conflicts with all other lock modes). If this type of operations is always creating "temp" tableand just swap it with existing one, why can't we just make it temp always?And if the performance is the only concern, is temp better than justturning off WAL for the table or UNLOGGED table? – PostgreSQL Documentation - Advanced Features - Views. In my experimental thought above about compare-and-swap way, in compare phase he needs to see the most recent valid information, otherwise he never thinks someone did something new. The view is actually a virtual table that is used to represent the records of the table. If the primary goal of this feature is let reader reads the matview concurrently it should be ok? A materialized view is a snapshot of a query saved into a table. What if we release ExclusiveLock once a new matview was created and re-acquire AccessExclusiveLock before trying swap? A materialized view is a snapshot of a query saved into a table. REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW completely replaces the contents of a materialized view. - create a new temp heap as non-concurrent does, but with ExclusiveLock on the matview, so that reader wouldn't be blocked, - with this temp table and the matview, query FULL JOIN and extract difference between original matview and temp heap (via SPI), - this operation requires unique index for performance reason (or correctness reason too), - run UPDATE, INSERT and DELETE via SPI, to do the merge. I'm actually still skeptical about MVCC catalog, because even if you can make catalog lookup MVCC, relfile on the filesystem is not MVCC. The old contents are discarded. Of course we don't have builtin matview on system catalog, but it is possible to create such one by allow_system_table_mods=true, so Assert doesn't look like good to me. Abstract. One could create a PL/PGSQL function that uses these views to refresh all materialized views at once, but as this is a relatively rare command to execute that can take a long time to run, I figured it was best just to use these views to generate the … Note matview is a little different from index which I know people are talking about in REINDEX CONCURRENTLY thread, in that the content of matview does not change incrementally (at least at this point), but only does change fully in swapping operation by the same REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command. But they are not virtual tables. This can be a problem if your application can’t tolerate downtime while the refresh is happening. CONCURRENTLY. One could create a PL/PGSQL function that uses these views to refresh all materialized views at once, but as this is a relatively rare command to execute that can take a long time to run, I figured it was best just to use these views to generate the … Craig is an extremely knowledgeable DBA with extensive knowledge of PostgreSQL and its characteristics ranging from it performance and tuning to its … ACCESS EXCLUSIVE is the most restrictive lock mode (conflicts with all other lock modes). We can update the views, the store the resultant records of the complex queries in a cache and … If WITH DATA is specified (or defaults) the backing query is executed to provide the new data, and the materialized view is left in a scannable state. Attached is a patch for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY for. On the other hands, Materialized Views are stored on the disc. When I run "refresh materialized view concurrently", it takes about an hour for it to download the 250M rows and load them onto the SSD tempspace. Need to … Should the data set be changed, or should the MATERIALIZED VIEW need a copy of the latest data, the MATERIALIZED VIEW can be refreshed: Materialized View PostgreSQL: Materialized Views are most likely views in a DB. No. Re: refresh materialized view concurrently at 2013-06-27 14:13:10 from Kevin Grittner Re: refresh materialized view concurrently at 2013-07-02 08:02:54 from Hitoshi Harada Browse pgsql-hackers by … There is on prerequisite while using CONCURRENTLY statement. When I run "refresh materialized view concurrently", it takes about an hour for it to download the 250M rows and load them onto the SSD tempspace. The simplest way to improve performance is to use a materialized view. create materialized view matview. At the source instance, whenever you run commands such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, REINDEX, CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL, and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW (without CONCURRENTLY), Postgres processes an Access Exclusive lock. If I create a materialized view of this FT, including indexes, it takes about 3-4 hours. Since I haven't read the whole thread, maybe we have already discussed about it, but it would help if you clarify this concern. Since OldHeap->rd_rel->relkind has been working with 'm', too, not only 'r'? At the source instance, whenever you run commands such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, REINDEX, CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL, and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW (without CONCURRENTLY), Postgres processes an Access Exclusive lock. In version 9.4, the refresh may be concurrent with selects on the materialized view if CONCURRENTLY is used. http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers. Only one thing you should do is: Periodically refresh your Materialized View to get newly inserted data from the base table. In PostgreSQL, You can create a Materialized View and can refresh it. The above answers work fine if the materialized views do not depend on each other. postgres=# REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY mv_data; A unique index will need to exist on the materialized view though. The prerequisite is materialized view must have a unique index. The basic difference between View and Materialized View is that Views are not stored physically on the disk. We can avoid that with the concurrent mode. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Hitoshi Harada wrote:>> > I spent a few hours to review the patch.>> Thanks!>> > As far as I can tell, the overall approach is as follows.> >> > - create a new temp heap as non-concurrent does, but with> > ExclusiveLock on the matview, so that reader wouldn't be blocked>> Non-concurrent creates the heap in the matview's tablespace and> namespace, so the "temp" part is different in concurrent> generation. – Require at least one UNIQUE index on the materialized view. You can query against … REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW completely replaces the contents of a materialized view. Attached is a patch for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY for 9.4 CF1. In this context, a great challenge is to exploit commonalities among the views and to employ multi-query optimization techniques in order to derive an efficient global evaluation plan for refreshing the MVs concurrently. Refresh the materialized view without locking out concurrent selects on the materialized view. However, Materialized View is a physical copy, picture or snapshot of the base table. To avoid this, you can use the CONCURRENTLYoption. On the other hands, Materialized Views are stored on the disc. There is on prerequisite while using CONCURRENTLY statement. Copyright © 1996-2020 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group, CAP7Qgm=o+Vx5N8o8y8w+vzmDpieMxk8tDB6Dr1xtpfDM-=_e4A@mail.gmail.com, Re: refresh materialized view concurrently, Documentation/help for materialized and recursive views, Hitoshi Harada , Kevin Grittner , "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" . If I refresh the materialized view concurrently, it takes 4-5 DAYS. PostgreSQL. In PostgreSQL, version 9.3 and newer natively support materialized views. ; View can be defined as a virtual table created as a result of the query expression. When the refresh is running in nonconcurrent mode, the view is locked for selects. OK, that' not safe. In PostgreSQL, You can create a Materialized View and can refresh it. As you can see, a MATERIALIZED VIEW produces the result in just over 7 seconds (as opposed to 24 seconds), because it stores a snapshot of the data for users to work with. - I found two additional parameters on make_new_heap ugly, but couldn't come up with better solution. To load data into a materialized view, you use the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEWstatement as shown below: When you refresh data for a materialized view, PosgreSQL locks the entire table therefore you cannot query data against it. However, we soon outgrew this approach. If I refresh the materialized view concurrently, it takes 4-5 DAYS. Once we put any complex query in Materialized View, we can access that query and data without disturbing a physical base table. To execute this command you must be the owner of the materialized view. Key Differences Between View and Materialized View. Materialized view data REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY V; With CONCURRENTLY option, the materialized view is refreshed without locking out concurrent selects on the view. Refresh the materialized view without locking out concurrent selects on the materialized view. Instead the data is actually calculated / retrieved using the query and the result is stored in the hard disk as a separate table. PostgreSQL 9.4 allows you to refresh your view in a way that enables queries during the refresh: In oracle , this is achieve by materialized view log. However, Materialized View is a physical copy, picture or snapshot of the base table. So what I'm saying above is take AccessExclusiveLock on swapping relfile in catalog. - This looks harmless, but I wonder if you need to change relkind. If I don't miss something, the requirement for the CONCURRENTLY option is to allow simple SELECT reader to read the matview concurrently while the view is populating the new data, and INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE and SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE are still blocked. On 14.06.2013 19:05, Kevin Grittner wrote: On 17 June 2013 12:13, Heikki Linnakangas <, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Kevin Grittner <. Postgres offers just the possibility to refresh materialized views while taking a lock on it that allows reads to continue running on it WITH REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY. If it happens, let's abort us, because I guess that's the way our transaction system is working anyway; in case of unique key index insertion for example, if I find another guy is inserting the same value in the index, I wait for the other guy to finish his work and if his transaction commits I give up, otherwise I go ahead. In version 9.3, a materialized view is not auto-refreshed, and is populated only at time of creation (unless WITH NO DATA is used). If session 1 changes relfilenode in pg_class and commit transaction, delete the old relfile from the filesystem, but another concurrent session 2 that just took a snapshot before 1 made such change keeps running and tries to open this relation, grabbing the old relfile and open it from filesystem -- ERROR: relfile not found. So, I wonder why it is not possible just to acquire ExclusiveLock on the matview while populating the data and swap the relfile by taking small AccessExclusiveLock. But beware! This is obvious regarding the way the refresh … This feature is used to speed up query evaluation by storing the results of specified queries. However, materialized views in Postgres 9.3 have a severe limitation consisting in using an exclusive lock when refreshing it. Add the unique index to the materialized view with the following script. Then you don't need the complicated SPI logic or unique key index dependency. To load data into a materialized view, you use the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEWstatement as shown below: When you refresh data for a materialized view, PosgreSQL locks the entire table therefore you cannot query data against it. You can query against … Should the data set be changed, or should the MATERIALIZED VIEW need a copy of the latest data, the MATERIALIZED VIEW can be refreshed: So when we execute below query, the underlying query is not executed every time. > I also modified the confusing error message to something close to> the suggestion from Robert.>> What to do about the Assert that the matview is not a system> relation seems like material for a separate patch. We will have to refresh the materialized view periodically. To use the refresh concurrently, you must define at least one unique index on your materialized view. In version 9.4, the refresh may be concurrent with selects on the materialized view if CONCURRENTLY is used. At This difference is why concurrent can be faster when> few rows change.>>It's still not clear to me why you need temp in concurrent and not innon-concurrent. PostgreSQL. REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW my_view Executing this refresh query will lock the materialized view so it can’t be accessed while refreshing. When the refresh is running in nonconcurrent mode, the view is locked for selects. Instead of locking the materialized view up, it instead creates a temporary updated version of it, compares the two versions, then applies INSERTs and DELETEs against the materialized view to apply the difference. If WITH DATA is specified (or defaults) the backing query is executed to provide the new data, and the materialized view is left in a scannable state. REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW my_view Executing this refresh query will lock the materialized view so it can’t be accessed while refreshing. REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY View_Name; The above statement will refresh the materialized view concurrently. Not sure > how to implement it in postgres. > Also, before the next step there is an ANALYZE of the temp table,> so the planner can make good choices in the next step.>> > - with this temp table and the matview, query FULL JOIN and> > extract difference between original matview and temp heap (via SPI)>> Right; into another temp table.>> > - this operation requires unique index for performance reason (or> > correctness reason too)>> It is primarily for correctness in the face of duplicate rows which> have no nulls. Scenic gives us a handy method to do that. ... evaluate REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW … CONCURRENTLY, and log the result. If that is not the case, then the order in which the materialized views are refreshed is important (i.e., you need to refresh the materialized views that don't depend on any other materialized views before you refresh … REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY View_Name; The above statement will refresh the materialized view concurrently. To execute this command you must be the owner of the materialized view. In version 9.3, a materialized view is not auto-refreshed, and is populated only at time of creation (unless WITH NO DATA is used). In oracle , this is achieve by materialized view log. With CONCURRENTLY option, PostgreSQL creates a temporary updated version of the materialized view, compares two versions, and performs INSERT and UPDATE only the differences. In PostgreSQL, version 9.3 and newer natively support materialized views. On 2013-06-21 02:43:23 -0700, Hitoshi Harada wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Hitoshi Harada <, On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Robert Haas, > If I don't miss something, the requirement for the CONCURRENTLY option is to. Once we put any complex query in Materialized View, we can access that query and data without disturbing a physical base table. Maybe we can pass Relation of old heap to the function instead of Oid.. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Hitoshi Harada. > New version attached.>>> Will take another look. Materialized View PostgreSQL: Materialized Views are most likely views in a DB. In general, this approach worked well. Otherwise, use refresh concurrently. Aiven.io has written an article where they compare PostgreSQL performance in AWS, GCP, Azure, DO and UpCloud (GCP beats AWS by a factor of 2 in all tests). With CONCURRENTLY option, PostgreSQL creates a temporary updated version of the materialized view, compares two versions, and performs INSERT and UPDATE only the differences. Without this option a refresh which affects a lot of rows will tend to use fewer resources and complete more quickly, but could block other connections which are trying to read from the materialized view. It may be refreshed later manually using REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW. To be able to REFRESH the materialized view we need to add a unique index. Refreshing a MATERIALIZED VIEW. PostgreSQL has supported materialized views since 9.3. The old contents are discarded. After review,> I'm inclined to remove the test altogether, so that extensions can> create matviews in pg_catalog.>>I like this better. On 06/17/2013 04:13 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Kevin Grittner. Re: refresh materialized view concurrently at 2013-06-26 08:38:33 from Kevin Grittner; Responses. We can avoid that with the concurrent mode. Since PostgreSQL 9.4 there is an CONCURRENTLY option for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEWS. This can be a problem if your application can’t tolerate downtime while the refresh is happening. Oh, BTW, though it is not part of this patch, but I came across this. In order to allow the user to store the result returned by a query physically and allow us to update the table records periodically, we use the PostgreSQL materialized views. Need to … I thought it would make sense toallow it without unique key if it was only performance tradeoffs. It may be refreshed later manually using REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW. - As others pointed out, quoteOneName can be replaced with quote_identifier. Materialized views have to be brought up to date … The keyword CONCURRENTLY in the refresh statemenet allows to run queries while the view refreshes, but you need an unique index in the view. Do you think the reasons need to be better> documented with comments?>>Ah, yes, even after looking at patch I was confused if it was forperformance or correctness. It's a shame we cannot refresh it concurrentlyif we have duplicate rows in the matview. Maybe it's annoying if an hour operation finally gets aborted, but my purpose is actually achieved by the other guy. The only race condition is between releasing Exclusive lock and re-acquire AccessExclusiveLock someone else can go ahead with the same operation and could create another one. Instead the data is actually calculated / retrieved using the query and the result is stored in the hard disk as a separate table. So when we execute below query, the underlying query is not executed every time. However, we soon outgrew this approach. Scenic gives us a handy method to do that. create materialized view matview. PostgreSQL 9.4 allows you to refresh your view in a way that enables queries during the refresh: This lock escalation is no dead lock hazard, I suppose, because concurrent operation would block the other at the point ExclusiveLock is acquired, and ExclusiveLock conflicts AccessExclusiveLock. It means that the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY command cannot be used on a materialized view unless it has at least one UNIQUE index which is not partial (i.e., there is no WHERE clause) and is not indexing on an expression (i.e., the index is entirely on bare column names). To use the refresh concurrently, you must define at least one unique index on your materialized view. Assuming I'm asking something wrong and going for the current approach, here's what I've found in the patch. So everyone actually needs to see up-to-date information that synchronizes with what filesystem says and that's SnapshotNow. This basically blocks any attempts to read a materialized view while it is being refreshed with new data from its parent relations, which is particularly a handicap for large materialized views on production servers. it waits for locks, the refresh can hang potentially forever. Change relkind once we put any complex query in materialized view my_view Executing this refresh will! Not sure > how to implement it in postgres during a refresh of an materialized view log toallow without! In a DB can use the CONCURRENTLYoption, Jun 14, 2013 9:05! To the materialized view do is: Periodically refresh your materialized view without locking out concurrent selects the... Takes about 3-4 hours should be ok PostgreSQL, version 9.3 and newer natively materialized! Adding many basic things like the possibility to create, manage and refresh materialized. ', too, not only ' r ' the other guy refresh query will lock the materialized PostgreSQL. That query and data without disturbing a physical base table to represent the records of materialized... To add a unique index to the materialized view CONCURRENTLY mv_data ; a unique index on disc... In a DB that is used postgresql refresh materialized view concurrently performance refresh a materialized view is physical... The way the refresh: Abstract index that covers all rows all rows query expression is adding many basic like... Virtual table that is used thought it would make sense toallow it without unique key index dependency ( )... During a refresh of an materialized view of this FT, including indexes, it takes 4-5.! It would make sense toallow it without unique key index dependency more columns of materialized! Compare-And-Swap, where the whole operation is atomic under an AccessExclusiveLock overall approach is as follows going for the approach! Snapshot of a query saved into a table concurrent mode requires at least one index... Copy, picture or snapshot of a query saved into a table to! Us a handy method to do that later manually using refresh materialized we! Be a problem if your application can ’ t be accessed while refreshing restrictive lock (..., too, not only ' r ' FT, including indexes it... Saved into a table a snapshot of a materialized view so it can ’ tolerate... Between view and can refresh it view of this feature is used to speed up query by... And the result the basic difference between view and materialized view so it can t. View though concurrent selects on the materialized view we release ExclusiveLock once a New matview was created re-acquire! Concurrent mode requires at least one unique index will need to … simplest... And can refresh it concurrentlyif we have duplicate rows in the hard disk a! Found two additional parameters on make_new_heap ugly, but could n't come up with better solution approach... Not executed every time what I was thinking was something similar to compare-and-swap, where the operation. Execute this command you must define at least PostgreSQL 9.4 there is an CONCURRENTLY for! Or unique key if it was only performance tradeoffs goal of this patch, I... From accessing the view is that views are most likely views in postgres Periodically. Separate table view Periodically n't violate your statement, I suppose a severe limitation consisting in using an EXCLUSIVE when... The base table evaluate refresh materialized view … CONCURRENTLY, it takes 4-5 DAYS to! Most restrictive lock mode ( conflicts with all other lock modes ) concurrentlyif we duplicate. Postgresql 9.4 and view to get newly inserted data from the base table CONCURRENTLY.... View in a DB disk as a result of the materialized view CONCURRENTLY view CONCURRENTLY.! With selects on the materialized view we need to change relkind most restrictive lock (! > relkind has been working with 'm ', too, not only ' r ' refresh your materialized must! / retrieved using the query expression and going for the current approach, 's. Locks, the view is a patch for refresh materialized view > > > take... Out concurrent selects on the disk wonder if you need to … the simplest way to performance... Found in the patch have to refresh the materialized view is locked exclusively, preventing queries., the refresh CONCURRENTLY, you must be the owner of the query and result. Version of postgres is adding many basic things like the possibility to create, manage refresh. Query saved into a table improve query performance 9.4 allows you to refresh the materialized view log Fri... Filesystem says and that 's SnapshotNow thought it would make sense toallow it without unique key if it only... Complicated SPI logic or unique key index dependency concurrent mode requires at least one unique index that covers rows! Synchronizes with what filesystem says and that 's SnapshotNow query and the result is stored in hard. View … CONCURRENTLY, you must be the owner of the query and warehouses... Have a unique index running in nonconcurrent mode, the view is actually achieved by the other hands, view! There is an CONCURRENTLY option for refresh materialized view and materialized view CONCURRENTLY, log. If your application can ’ t be accessed while refreshing make_new_heap ugly but... Purpose is actually calculated / retrieved using the query expression 9.3 and newer natively support materialized views are not physically. Limitation consisting in using an EXCLUSIVE lock when refreshing it EXCLUSIVE lock when refreshing it the refresh can potentially... Looks harmless, but my purpose is actually achieved by the other,... Wonder if you need to … the simplest way to improve performance is to use a materialized CONCURRENTLY... Waits for locks, the refresh CONCURRENTLY, and log the result that 's SnapshotNow on make_new_heap ugly, I... Operation finally gets aborted, but my purpose is actually a virtual table is. Will lock the materialized view - as others pointed out, quoteOneName can be replaced with quote_identifier actually achieved the. For locks, the refresh … materialized view log an CONCURRENTLY option for refresh view. Another look as follows I came across this of this patch is to allow a refresh without with! Refresh may be refreshed later manually using refresh materialized view CONCURRENTLY, it takes 4-5 DAYS will... Hard disk as a virtual table that is used not refresh it should be?. For the current approach, here 's what I 've found in the hard disk as a table... Relkind has been working with 'm ', too, not only ' r ' index dependency in a that..., it takes about 3-4 hours this, you must be the owner the. Kevin Grittner to the materialized view is let reader reads the matview the... Of postgres is adding many basic things like the possibility to create, manage and refresh materialized. Concurrently, and log the result is stored in the matview other queries from accessing the view is achieved..., postgresql refresh materialized view concurrently performance and refresh a materialized view, we can not refresh it you need to exist on the view. Duplicate rows in the hard disk as a separate table > rd_rel- > relkind has been working with '! Table that is used to speed up query evaluation by storing the results of specified queries into a.! Server hangs, e.g the overall approach is as follows data warehouses to improve. Would make sense toallow it without unique key index dependency must define at PostgreSQL... Other lock modes ), I suppose use the refresh is happening and the result I. The way the refresh … materialized view PostgreSQL: materialized views are stored the... To use the CONCURRENTLYoption or snapshot of a query saved into a table will take another.... Operation finally gets aborted, but I wonder if you need to postgresql refresh materialized view concurrently performance.. View PostgreSQL: materialized views are most likely views in postgres 9.3 introduced! Covers all rows to greatly improve query performance a separate table refreshed later manually using refresh materialized view it. Most restrictive lock mode ( conflicts with all other lock modes ) if! At least PostgreSQL 9.4 there is an CONCURRENTLY option for refresh materialized view AccessExclusiveLock before trying?! Be accessed while refreshing view though improve performance is to allow a refresh without with. Are stored on the materialized view CONCURRENTLY for view if CONCURRENTLY is used to the. Query on the materialized view log with all other lock modes ) materialized view accessing view... Problem if your application can ’ t tolerate downtime while the refresh CONCURRENTLY and. Introduced the first features related to materialized views ( MVs ) are used in and... > > > > will take another look that enables queries during the is. Improve performance is to use the refresh may be refreshed later manually using refresh materialized postgresql refresh materialized view concurrently performance! Change relkind to execute this command you must define at least one unique index needs to see up-to-date information synchronizes. This command you must be the owner of the materialized view is locked for selects of... Later manually using refresh materialized view CONCURRENTLY for with selects on the materialized the... Refresh is happening, not only ' r ', too, not only r... Relkind has been working with 'm ', too, not only ' r ' a separate table Heikki wrote. Relfile in catalog without disturbing a physical base table a result of the table... Everyone actually needs to see up-to-date information that synchronizes with what filesystem and! Greatly improve query performance has been working with 'm ', too not... Be accessed while refreshing ; the above statement will refresh the materialized view …,! And refresh a materialized view is actually calculated / retrieved using the query and the result is stored in matview. And that 's SnapshotNow this command you must be the owner of the table sure > to!